Effect of Surface Polarity on Water Contact Angle and Interfacial Hydration Structure
Top Cited Papers
- 21 July 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Chemical Society (ACS) in The Journal of Physical Chemistry B
- Vol. 111 (32) , 9581-9587
- https://doi.org/10.1021/jp071957s
Abstract
We perform molecular dynamics simulations of water in the presence of hydrophobic/hydrophilic walls at T = 300 K and P = 0 GPa. For the hydrophilic walls, we use a hydroxylated silica model introduced in previous simulations [Lee, S. H.; Rossky, P. J. J. Chem. Phys.1994, 100, 3334. Giovambattista, N.; Rossky, P. J.; Debenedetti, P. G.; Phys. Rev. E2006, 73, 041604.]. By rescaling the physical partial atomic charges by a parameter 0 ≤ k ≤ 1, we can continuously transform the hydrophilic walls (hydroxylated silica, k = 1) into hydrophobic apolar surfaces (k = 0). From a physical point of view, k is the normalized magnitude of a surface dipole moment, and thus it quantifies the polarity of the surface. We calculate the contact angle of water for 0 ≤ k ≤ 1. We find that, at least for the present homogeneous, atomically flat, and defect-free surface model, the magnitude of the surface dipole correlates with the contact angle in a one-to-one correspondence. In particular, we find that polar surfaces with 0 < k ≤ kc = 0.4 are macroscopically hydrophobic; that is, the contact angle is larger than 90°. For the cutoff value k = kc, the magnitude of the dipole moment of the polar silica surface unit is 41% that of the water molecule dipole moment. We also study the water orientation distributions next to the walls (a microscopic property). We find that these distributions also correlate with the contact angle in a one-to-one correspondence. Thus, the structure of confined water, the surface polarity, and the contact angle are in a direct correspondence to each other, and therefore, each quantifies the hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity of the surface.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of Surface Roughness on SuperhydrophobicityPhysical Review Letters, 2006
- Tuning Solid Surfaces from Hydrophobic to Superhydrophilic by Submonolayer Surface ModificationPhysical Review Letters, 2006
- Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assemblyNature, 2005
- Electrowetting: from basics to applicationsJournal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 2005
- Fluidity of Hydration Layers Nanoconfined between Mica SurfacesPhysical Review Letters, 2005
- Superhydrophobic statesNature Materials, 2003
- Pearl dropsEurophysics Letters, 1999
- Surface geochemistry of the clay mineralsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1999
- Dominant forces in protein foldingBiochemistry, 1990
- Some Factors in the Interpretation of Protein DenaturationAdvances in Protein Chemistry, 1959