Physician Reporting of Adverse Drug Reactions
- 4 April 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 263 (13) , 1785-1788
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440130073028
Abstract
The Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Md, contracted with the Rhode Island Department of Health, Providence, to conduct a project to increase reporting of suspected adverse drug reactions through physician education. Voluntary reporting, an important part of postmarketing surveillance that signals potential problems with marketed drugs, historically has been underused by physicians. After 2 years, there was a more than 17-fold increase in reports submitted directly from Rhode Island compared with the yearly average before initiation of the project. Increases in the total numbers of reports were paralleled by significant increases in the numbers of reports of severe reactions. Similar increases were not experienced nationally. Physicians in Rhode Island were surveyed before and 2 years after interventions began to determine changes in knowledge and attitudes about reporting of adverse drug reactions. Significant gains in knowledge and positive attitudes toward the reporting system occurred. We conclude that physicians can be stimulated to increase their reporting of suspected reactions, thereby improving the viability of the federal reporting system. (JAMA. 1990;263:1785-1788)Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Statewide Program to Stimulate Reporting of Adverse Drug ReactionsJournal of Pharmacy Practice, 1989
- The importance of adverse reaction reporting by physicians. Suprofen and the flank pain syndromePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1988
- Adverse Drug Events: Identification and AttributionDrug Intelligence & Clinical Pharmacy, 1987
- Adverse-Drug-Reaction MonitoringNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Identification of adverse reactions to new drugs. II (continued): How were 18 important adverse reactions discovered and with what delays?BMJ, 1983