Structural Equation Models and the Regression Bias for Measuring Correlates of Change
- 1 December 2000
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Vol. 60 (6) , 893-907
- https://doi.org/10.1177/00131640021970970
Abstract
ANCOVA and regression both exhibit a directional bias when measuring correlates of change. This bias confounds the comparison of changes between naturally occurring groups with large pretest differences (ANCOVA), or for identifying predictors of change when the predictor is correlated with pretest (regression). This bias is described in some detail. A computer simulation study is presented, which shows that properly identified structural equation models are not susceptible to this bias. Neither gain scores (posttest minus pretest) nor structural equation models exhibit the “regression bias.” Other factors, such as skewness, that may confound measurement of change are also discussed.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 1999
- Latent Variable Modeling of Longitudinal and Multilevel Substance Use DataMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1997
- Studying Multivariate Change Using Multilevel Models and Latent Curve ModelsMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1997
- Measurement of Change and the Law of Initial Values: A Computer Simulation StudyEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1995
- Correlates of reactivity: problems with regression based methodsInternational Journal of Psychophysiology, 1994
- The law of initial values: five factors or two?International Journal of Psychophysiology, 1993
- The law of initial values: a four factor theoryInternational Journal of Psychophysiology, 1992
- The Reliability and Specificity of Delta Versus Residualized Change as Measures of Cardiovascular Reactivity to Behavioral ChallengesPsychophysiology, 1991
- A paradox in the interpretation of group comparisons.Psychological Bulletin, 1967