Use and Misuse of the Term “Cost Effective” in Medicine
- 23 January 1986
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 314 (4) , 253-256
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm198601233140421
Abstract
There has been mounting pressure on the medical profession in recent years to stem the rise in national health care expenditures. One result of that pressure has been the popularization of the term "cost effective" in medicine. Examples of its use abound in the medical literature, in drug and equipment advertisements, and in the hallways and lecture halls of medical institutions. Unfortunately, many who assert that a specified medical practice is cost effective fail to couple that statement with appropriate documentation of associated costs and benefits.1 Even when these have been computed, the conclusions drawn from them have been based . . .Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cost effectiveness of the all-digital nuclear medicine department.Radiology, 1983
- Outpatient transluminal angioplasty.Radiology, 1983
- Economic impact of CT scanning on the evaluation of pituitary adenomasAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1983
- Diagnosis and Treatment of DyspepsiaMedical Decision Making, 1982
- Estrogen Use in Postmenopausal Women — Costs, Risks, and BenefitsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- The effect of the computed tomographic scanner on utilization and charges for alternative diagnostic procedures.Radiology, 1980
- The Cost Effectiveness of Therapeutic and Prophylactic Leukocyte TransfusionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1980
- Foundations of Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Health and Medical PracticesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Cranial Computed Tomography: An Evaluation of Cost EffectivenessRadiology, 1975
- What Do We Gain from the Sixth Stool Guaiac?New England Journal of Medicine, 1975