Pretreatment cytogenetics add to other prognostic factors predicting complete remission and long-term outcome in patients 60 years of age or older with acute myeloid leukemia: results from Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8461
Top Cited Papers
- 1 July 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Hematology in Blood
- Vol. 108 (1) , 63-73
- https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2005-11-4354
Abstract
We investigated the relative prognostic significance of cytogenetics in 635 adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients 60 years of age or older treated on front-line protocols. Classification trees and tree-structured survival analysis (TSSA) were used to identify important cytogenetic groups, and their prognostic significance was then assessed in multivariable analysis (MVA). Overall, 48.5% achieved complete remission (CR); 6.6% survived at 5 years. Complex karyotypes with at least 3 abnormalities (complex ≥ 3) and a group including “rare aberrations” predicted lower CR rates (25% and 30%) versus other patients (56%). Compared with complex ≥ 3, the odds of CR were significantly higher for noncomplex karyotypes without rare aberrations on MVA. Cytogenetically, complex ≥ 5 predicted inferior disease-free survival on TSSA, remaining significant on MVA together with white blood cell count (WBC), sex, and age. For survival, complex ≥ 5, rare aberrations, and core-binding factor (CBF) abnormalities were prognostic (P < .001), with 5-year survivals of 0%, 0%, and 19.4%, respectively, and 7.5% for remaining patients. Together with WBC, marrow blasts, sex, and age, the cytogenetic groups remained significant on MVA. In conclusion, pretreatment cytogenetics adds to other prognostic factors in older AML patients. Patients with complex ≥ 5 appear to benefit minimally from current treatment and are better suited for investigational therapy or supportive care. (Blood. 2006;108:63-73)Keywords
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- SmcHD1, containing a structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain, has a critical role in X inactivationNature Genetics, 2008
- Comparative outcome of nonmyeloablative and myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients older than 50 years of ageBlood, 2005
- A phase 1 study of SU11248 in the treatment of patients with refractory or resistant acute myeloid leukemia (AML) or not amenable to conventional therapy for the diseaseBlood, 2005
- Double minute chromosomes in monoblastic (M5) and myeloblastic (M2) acute myeloid leukemia: Two case reports and a review of literatureAmerican Journal of Hematology, 2004
- Elderly Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukaemia: Characteristics in Biology, Patients and Treatment. Recommendations of the Working Group Geriatric Oncology of the German Society for Haematology and Oncology (DGHO), the Austrian Society for Haematology and Oncology (ÖGHO) and the German Society for Geriatrics (DGG)Oncology Research and Treatment, 2004
- Structural rearrangements of chromosome 3 in 57 patients with acute myeloid leukemia: clinical, hematological and cytogenetic featuresThe Hematology Journal, 2002
- Double minute chromosomes in acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome: Identification of new amplification regions by fluorescence in situ hybridization and spectral karyotypingGenes, Chromosomes and Cancer, 2002
- Prognostic Factors in Elderly Patients with Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: A Single Center Study in JapanLeukemia & Lymphoma, 2002
- A simple, robust, validated and highly predictive index for the determination of risk‐directed therapy in acute myeloid leukaemia derived from the MRC AML 10 trialBritish Journal of Haematology, 1999
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958