Block of current through T‐type calcium channels by trivalent metal cations and nickel in neural rat and human cells.

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
1. The effects of the trivalent cations yttrium (Y3+), lanthanum (La3+), cerium (Ce3+), neodymium (Nd3+), gadolinium (Gd3+), holmium (Ho3+), erbium (Er3+), ytterbium (Yb3+) and the divalent cation nickel (Ni2+) on the T-type voltage gated calcium channel (VGCC) were characterized by the whole-cell patch clamp technique using rat and human thyroid C cell lines. 2. All the metal cations (M3+) studied, blocked current through T-type VGCC (IT) in a concentration-dependent manner. Smaller trivalents were the best T-channel antagonists and potency varied inversely with ionic radii for the larger M3+ ions. Estimation of half-maximal blocking concentrations (IC50s) for IT carried by 10 mM Ca2+ resulted in the following potency sequence: Ho3+ (IC50 = 0.107 microM) approximately Y3+ (0.117) approximately Yb3+ (0.124) > or = Er3+ (0.153) > Gd3+ (0.267) > Nd3+ (0.429) > Ce3+ (0.728) > La3+ (1.015) >> Ni2+ (5.65). 3. Tail current measurements and conditioning protocols were used to study the influence of membrane voltage on the potency of these antagonists. Block of IT by Ni2+, Y3+, La3+ and the lanthanides was voltage independent in the range from -200 to +80 mV. In addition, the antagonists did not affect macroscopic inactivation and deactivation of T-type VGCC. 4. Increasing the extracellular Ca2+ concentration reduced the potency of IT block by Ho3+, indicative of competitive antagonism between this blocker and the permeant ion for a binding site. 5. The results suggest that the mechanism of metal cation block of T-type VGCC is occlusion of the channel pore by the antagonist binding to a Ca2+/M3+ binding site, located out of the membrane electric field. 6. Block of T-type VGCC by Y3+, lanthanides and La3+ differ from the inhibition of high voltage-activated VGCC block in several respects: smaller cations are more potent IT antagonists; block is voltage independent and the antagonists do not permeate T-type channels. These differences suggest corresponding structural dissimilarities in the permeation pathways of low and high voltage-activated Ca2+ channels.