Critically evaluating an applications vs theory framework for research quality
- 30 June 1999
- Vol. 27 (3) , 397-401
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-0483(98)00066-8
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- An observation on publication habits based on the analysis of MS/OR journalsOmega, 1997
- THE 1996 RESEARCH ASSESSMENT EXERCISEThe British Accounting Review, 1997
- Judging the quality of research in business schools: A comment from accountingOmega, 1996
- Citation as effortful voting: A reply to ones, Brinn and PendleburyOmega, 1996
- Journal evaluation methodologies: A balanced responseOmega, 1996
- UK Accountants' Perceptions of Research Journal QualityAccounting and Business Research, 1996
- Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case studyOmega, 1995
- The Familiarity with and Perceived Quality of Accounting Journals: Views of Senior Accounting Faculty in Leading U.S. MBA Programs*Contemporary Accounting Research, 1994
- Education And Research Notes The 1992 Research Assessment ExerciseThe British Accounting Review, 1993
- Performance indices and related measures of journal reputation in accountingThe British Accounting Review, 1989