Difference in Pathogenesis Between Vitiligo Vulgaris and Halo Nevi Associated with Vitiligo is Supported by an HLA Association Study
- 11 May 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pigment Cell Research
- Vol. 17 (3) , 270-274
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0749.2004.00145.x
Abstract
Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class II associations with two subtypes of vitiligo: vitiligo vulgaris and halo nevi associated with vitiligo were investigated. In previous studies associations between vitiligo and HLA antigens have been reported but these two subtypes have never been taken into account. However from a clinical and histological point of view, a difference in (auto)‐immune pathogenesis can be expected. This difference might be reflected in an association with different HLA alleles. Seventy‐six unrelated Dutch Caucasians, 40 with vitiligo vulgaris and 36 with halo nevi associated with vitiligo were included. A panel of randomly chosen HLA typed healthy Dutch blood donors (n = 2400) served as control population. HLA‐DR and ‐DQ typing was carried out on blood samples by amplifying genomic DNA using polymerase chain reaction followed by dot blot hybridization with sequence specific oligonucleotides. The main outcome measures were odds ratio (OR), uncorrected P‐value (Pu) and corrected P‐value. There were distinct differences in the clinical manifestations between vitiligo vulgaris and halo nevi associated with vitiligo with respect to precipitating factors, extent and progress of the disease and the association with other auto‐immune diseases in the two subtypes and their respective first degree family members. Our stratification reveals differences in HLA class II between both subtypes and between subtypes and controls. A case–control association study showed a significant positive association of HLA‐DR4 (OR = 2.787, Pu = 0.0022) and DR53 (OR = 2.249, Pu = 0.0153) and a negative association of HLA‐DR3 (OR = 0.195, Pu = 0.0024) with vitiligo vulgaris. The group with halo nevi associated with vitiligo did not show these associations, but had a significant negative association with HLA‐DR11 (OR = 0.083, Pu = 0.0067). In conclusion, the differences in HLA association within clinical subtypes of vitiligo support our suggestion that vitiligo vulgaris and halo nevi associated with vitiligo have distinct pathogenic mechanisms.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Genomewide Screen for Generalized Vitiligo: Confirmation of AIS1 on Chromosome 1p31 and Evidence for Additional Susceptibility LociAmerican Journal of Human Genetics, 2003
- STUDY OF HLA CLASS I/II AND T LYMPHOCYTE SUBSETS IN KUWAITI VITILIGO PATIENTSInternational Journal of Immunogenetics, 1995
- HLA antigens in Omani patients with vitiligoClinical and Experimental Dermatology, 1995
- Biotinylated DRB sequence-specific oligonucleotides Comparison to serologic HLA-DR typing of organ donors in eurotransplantHuman Immunology, 1993
- Histocompatibility Antigens in Vitiligo: Hamburg Study on 102 Patients from Northern GermanyDermatology, 1993
- Molecular Heterogeneity of the Fourth Component of Complement (C4) and its Genes in VitiligoJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 1992
- Analysis of Major Histocompatibility Antigens and the Mononuclear Cell Infiltrate in Halo NeviJournal of Investigative Dermatology, 1985
- Association of HLA-DR4 with vitiligoJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 1983
- HL‐A AND DISEASE THE DETECTION OF ASSOCIATIONSInternational Journal of Immunogenetics, 1974
- ON ESTIMATING THE RELATION BETWEEN BLOOD GROUP AND DISEASEAnnals of Human Genetics, 1955