Comparison of single-layer inverting, two-layer inverting, and everting anastomoses in the rabbit colon
- 1 June 1973
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in British Journal of Surgery
- Vol. 60 (6) , 453-457
- https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800600610
Abstract
Inverting methods of suture should be used in colonic anastomosis. A two-layer inverting anastomosis is usually recommended but it has been suggested that a single-layer technique is preferable and safer. Single-layer inverting, two-layer inverting, and everting anastomoses were compared in the unprepared rabbit colon. Everting anastomoses gave inferior results by comparison with both inverting methods with respect to tensile strength, anastomotic leakage, and histological evidence of healing, but no difference was found between the single-layer and two-layer methods using these criteria and measurement of colonic collagen. It was concluded that single-layer inverting methods of anastomosis had no particular advantages over the standard two-layer inverting method.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Everting and inverting anastomoses: An experimental study of comparative safetyThe American Journal of Surgery, 1971
- A controlled trial of inverting versus everting intestinal suture in clinical large-bowel surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 1970
- One layer or two layer colonic anastomoses?The American Journal of Surgery, 1970
- A single-layer intestinal anastomosisBritish Journal of Surgery, 1969
- Colonic anastomosis: A clinical and experimental studyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1968
- A study of intestinal healingJournal of Pediatric Surgery, 1968
- Reappraisal of Open Intestinal AnastomosesAnnals of Surgery, 1967
- The Technique and Significance of Hydroxyproline Measurement in ManPublished by Elsevier ,1967
- Ten years' experience with a single layeranastomosis in colon surgeryThe American Journal of Surgery, 1956
- CIRCULAR SUTURE OF THE INTESTINE–AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDYThe Lancet Healthy Longevity, 1887