The Importance of Magnitude Information in Numerical Processing: Evidence from the SNARC Effect
- 1 April 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Mathematical Cognition
- Vol. 2 (1) , 95-110
- https://doi.org/10.1080/135467996387552
Abstract
Models of the numerical cognitive system differ in the importance they attach to magnitude information in numerical processing. In this paper, the necessity of addressing a central semantic magnitude system in arabic number processing is evaluated by looking at the SNARC-effect (Dehaene, Bossini, & Giraux, 1993). The existence of a Spatial Numerical Association of Response Codes (small numbers are reacted to faster with the left hand, large numbers with the right hand) has been interpreted as an indication of access to the semantic system. In Experiment 1, we replicated the effect in a parity judgement task. In Experiment 2, we extended the SNARC-effect to a phoneme monitoring task, showing that magnitude information was accessed during arabic-to-verbal transcoding. Experiment 3 demonstrated that the SNARC effect in the phoneme monitoring task did not change with practice. We conclude, therefore, that number magnitude plays a more important role than is generally accepted.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attention, automaticity, and levels of representation in number processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1995
- Architectures for numerical cognitionCognition, 1994
- The mental representation of parity and number magnitude.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1993
- Preverbal and verbal counting and computationCognition, 1992
- Varieties of numerical abilitiesCognition, 1992
- Cognitive mechanisms in numerical processing: Evidence from acquired dyscalculiaCognition, 1992
- Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990
- An encoding-complex view of cognitive number processing: Comment on McCloskey, Sokol, and Goodman (1986).Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1988
- Cognitive mechanisms in number processing and calculation: Evidence from dyscalculiaBrain and Cognition, 1985
- Is three greater than five: The relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasksMemory & Cognition, 1982