An Uneasy Case against Property Rights in Body Parts
- 1 January 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Social Philosophy and Policy
- Vol. 11 (2) , 259-286
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265052500004519
Abstract
This essay deals with property rights in body parts that can be exchanged in a market. The inquiry arises in the following context. With some exceptions, the laws of many countries permit only the donation, not the sale, of body parts. Yet for some years there has existed a shortage of body parts for transplantation and other medical uses. It might then appear that if more sales were legally permitted, the supply of body parts would increase, because people would have more incentive to sell than they currently have to donate. To allow sales is to recognize property rights in body parts. To allow sales, however, makes body parts into “commodities”—that is, things that can be bought and sold in a market. And some view it as morally objectionable to treat body parts as commodities.Keywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Kant and Property Rights in Body PartsCanadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 1993
- Lacking a Transformative Social Theory: A ResponseStanford Law Review, 1993
- The Economics and Ethics of Markets for Human OrgansJournal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 1989
- Forgiveness, resentment and hatredPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1988
- Market-InalienabilityHarvard Law Review, 1987
- Property and PersonhoodStanford Law Review, 1982
- A Right to Do WrongEthics, 1981
- Human Organs and the Open MarketEthics, 1980
- Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the CathedralHarvard Law Review, 1972
- KPublished by Springer Nature ,1924