The ex vivo antimicrobial activity and colonization rate of two antimicrobial-bonded central venous catheters
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Critical Care Medicine
- Vol. 27 (6) , 1128-1131
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-199906000-00034
Abstract
Catheter-related sepsis is an important complication associated with the use of central venous catheters. Recent studies have suggested that antimicrobial-bonded catheters may reduce catheter colonization and catheter-related sepsis. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between the antimicrobial activity and the colonization rate of two commercially available antimicrobial-bonded central venous catheters. Prospective, randomized, controlled, nonblinded study. Medical intensive care unit of a university-affiliated teaching hospital. One hundred twenty consecutive medical intensive care unit patients requiring new central venous catheters (fresh stick). Patients were randomized to receive a) a Standard Arrow; b) an ARROWgard; or c) a Cook Bio-Guard Spectrum central venous catheter. Central venous catheters were removed when they were no longer required or when catheter-related sepsis was suspected. Under aseptic conditions, the distal 12 cm of the removed catheters were cut into six 2-cm segments. Semiquantitative culture was performed (by roll technique) on the distal segment. Colonization was defined as >15 colony-forming units. Using a modified Kirby-Bauer technique, the zone of inhibition of the remaining five segments was determined against the following organisms: methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Staphylococcus epidermidis, Enterococcus faecalis, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Candida albicans. Catheters that were removed within 24 hrs of insertion were excluded from the analysis. Seven patients were not assessable. The baseline clinical and demographic characteristics were similar among the three groups of patients. Eleven Standard Arrow (28%), seven ARROWgard (19%), and four BioGuard (11%) catheters were colonized (p = .05 for Bio-Guard vs. control). Staphylococci were the most common colonizing organisms. Two patients with Standard Arrow catheters (5%) and one patient with an ARROWgard catheter (3%) developed catheter-related sepsis. Antibiotic-coated catheters significantly inhibited the growth of all test organisms except C. albicans (p The Bio-Guard central venous catheter had greater ex vivo antimicrobial activity against MRSA, S. epidermidis, and E. faecalis compared with the ARROWgard catheter, and this was associated with a significantly lower rate of catheter colonization. (Crit Care Med 1999; 27:1128-1131)Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antimicrobial durability and rare ultrastructural colonization of indwelling central catheters coated with minocycline and rifampinCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Central Venous Catheters Coated with Minocycline and Rifampin for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Colonization and Bloodstream InfectionsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Prevention of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infection by Use of an Antiseptic-Impregnated CatheterAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1997
- Effect of Subcutaneous Tunneling on Internal Jugular Catheter-Related Sepsis in Critically III PatientsJAMA, 1996
- Prospective, randomized trial of two antiseptic solutions for prevention of central venous or arterial catheter colonization and infection in intensive care unit patientsCritical Care Medicine, 1996
- Prevention of infections associated with intravascular devicesCurrent Opinion in Critical Care, 1996
- Guideline for Prevention of Intravascular-Device-Related InfectionsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 1996
- Efficacy of Subcutaneous Silver-Impregnated Cuffs in Preventing Central Venous Catheter InfectionsChest, 1996
- Efficacy of an Attachable Subcutaneous Cuff for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related InfectionJAMA, 1989
- A comparative study of polyantibiotic and iodophor ointments in prevention of vascular catheter-related infectionThe American Journal of Medicine, 1981