Influence of Adriamycin Dose in the Outcome of Patients with Osteosarcoma Treated with Multidrug Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Results of Two Sequential Studies
- 1 August 1993
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Chemotherapy
- Vol. 5 (4) , 237-246
- https://doi.org/10.1080/1120009x.1993.11739239
Abstract
The results of two sequential studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for osteosarcoma of the extremities performed at Rizzoli Institute between 1986 and 1991 in 228 patients are presented. In both studies preoperative chemotherapy consisted of two cycles of high dose methotrexate (HDMTX), cisplatinum (CDP) and adriamycin (ADM). Postoperatively the good responder patients were treated with the same drugs used before surgery while in the poor responder patients ifosfamide was added to these three drugs. The preoperative treatment was the same in both studies while after surgery in the second protocol either the cumulative dose of ADM (270 mg/m2 instead of 360 mg/m2) or the single dose per cycle of this drug (60 mg/m2 instead of 90 mg/m2) was reduced. These changes in the last protocol were done to reduce the cardiotoxicity of ADM that was high in the first study (2 deaths and 1 heart transplantation). Since in the last protocol – in comparison with the first protocol – after surgery chemotherapy was restarted earlier and ADM was administered not as a single drug but in combination with the CDP the dose intensity of ADM was unchanged while the dose intensity of MTX, CDP and ifosfamide was higher than in the first study. The preliminary results of the 84 patients treated in the second study show a 2-year disease free survival significantly lower than that achieved in the 144 patients treated in the first study (37/51 – 73% vs 123/144 – 85%: P < 0.008). In addition, even if in the last study there were no cases of clinical cardiotoxicity due to ADM, there was a significantly higher percentage of severe myelodepression that led to two deaths for infectious complications. These results suggest that in neoadjuvant treatment of osteosarcoma the total dose of ADM and/or the single dose per cycle of the same drug are an important determinant of outcome and that increasing the dose-intensity of less toxic but less active agents, MTX, CDP and ifosfamide, at the expense of the more active and more toxic agent, ADM, can lead to a poorer outcome without reducing toxicity.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Influence of Doxorubicin Dose Intensity on Response and Outcome for Patients With Osteogenic Sarcoma and Ewing's SarcomaJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1991
- Local Control and Survival from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group Studies of the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and the Vienna Bone Tumor RegistryClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1991
- Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Nonmetastatic Osteosarcoma of the ExtremitiesClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1991
- Primary chemotherapy and delayed surgery (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) for osteosarcoma of the extremities the istituto rizzoli experience in 127 patients treated preoperatively with intravenous methotrexate (high versus moderate doses) and intraarterial cisplatinCancer, 1990
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy of osteosarcoma: results of a randomized cooperative trial (COSS-82) with salvage chemotherapy based on histological tumor response.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1988
- The Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Relapse-Free Survival in Patients with Osteosarcoma of the ExtremityNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Histologic evaluation of necrosis in osteosarcoma induced by chemotherapy regional mapping of viable and nonviable tumorCancer, 1985
- The treatment of osteosarcoma of the extremities: Twenty year's experience at the istituto ortopedico rizzoliCancer, 1981
- A System for the Surgical Staging of Musculoskeletal SarcomaClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 1980
- Amputation and Adriamycin in Primary OsteosarcomaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1974