End-of-Life Practices in European Intensive Care Units
Top Cited Papers
- 13 August 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 290 (6) , 790-797
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.6.790
Abstract
Research from JAMA — End-of-Life Practices in European Intensive Care Units — The Ethicus Study — ContextWhile the adoption of practice guidelines is standardizing many aspects of patient care, ethical dilemmas are occurring because of forgoing life-sustaining therapies in intensive care and are dealt with in diverse ways between different countries and cultures.ObjectivesTo determine the frequency and types of actual end-of-life practices in European intensive care units (ICUs) and to analyze the similarities and differences.Design and SettingA prospective, observational study of European ICUs.ParticipantsConsecutive patients who died or had any limitation of therapy.InterventionProspectively defined end-of-life practices in 37 ICUs in 17 European countries were studied from January 1, 1999, to June 30, 2000.Main Outcome MeasuresComparison and analysis of the frequencies and patterns of end-of-life care by geographic regions and different patients and professionals.ResultsOf 31 417 patients admitted to ICUs, 4248 patients (13.5%) died or had a limitation of life-sustaining therapy. Of these, 3086 patients (72.6%) had limitations of treatments (10% of admissions). Substantial intercountry variability was found in the limitations and the manner of dying: unsuccessful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 20% (range, 5%-48%), brain death in 8% (range, 0%-15%), withholding therapy in 38% (range, 16%-70%), withdrawing therapy in 33% (range, 5%-69%), and active shortening of the dying process in 2% (range, 0%-19%). Shortening of the dying process was reported in 7 countries. Doses of opioids and benzodiazepines reported for shortening of the dying process were in the same range as those used for symptom relief in previous studies. Limitation of therapy vs continuation of life-sustaining therapy was associated with patient age, acute and chronic diagnoses, number of days in ICU, region, and religion (P<.001).ConclusionThe limiting of life-sustaining treatment in European ICUs is common and variable. Limitations were associated with patient age, diagnoses, ICU stay, and geographic and religious factors. Although shortening of the dying process is rare, clarity between withdrawing therapies and shortening of the dying process and between therapies intended to relieve pain and suffering and those intended to shorten the dying process may be lacking.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cardiopulmonary resuscitation directives on admission to intensive-care unit: an international observational studyThe Lancet, 2001
- Doctors' authoritarianism in end-of-life treatment decisions. A comparison between Russia, Sweden and GermanyJournal of Medical Ethics, 2001
- Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive-care units in France: a prospective surveyThe Lancet, 2001
- A National Survey of End-of-life Care for Critically Ill PatientsAmerican Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1998
- Withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit: A comparison of teaching and community hospitalsCritical Care Medicine, 1998
- Forgoing life-sustaining treatment in an Israeli ICUIntensive Care Medicine, 1998
- A retrospective review of a large cohort of patients undergoing the process of withholding or withdrawal of life supportCritical Care Medicine, 1997
- Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill.American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 1997
- Trends from the United States with end of life decisions in the intensive care unitIntensive Care Medicine, 1993
- Ordering and administration of sedatives and analgesics during the withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill patientsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1992