Why So Few Women Directors in Top UK Boardrooms? Evidence and Theoretical Explanations
Top Cited Papers
- 15 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Corporate Governance: An International Review
- Vol. 12 (4) , 479-488
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00388.x
Abstract
Using evidence from a survey of women directors in FTSE 100 companies, this paper considers possible explanations for the persistent homogeneity of top UK boards. Only 61 per cent of the top 100 companies had female directors in 2002, down from 64 per cent in 1999. Women held only 3 per cent of executive (= US inside) directorships, and there were only 15 women executive directors in total. Explanations usually include women's lack of ambition, lack of experience and lack of commitment. These have been disproved by research, but underlying theories of social exclusion may provide insight into this persistent phenomenon.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Women Directors on Top UK BoardsCorporate Governance: An International Review, 2001
- A decade of corporate women: some progress in the boardroom,none in the executive suiteStrategic Management Journal, 1999
- Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceilingAcademy of Management Perspectives, 1998
- Self-promotion as a risk factor for women: The costs and benefits of counterstereotypical impression management.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998
- Defections from the Inner Circle: Social Exchange, Reciprocity, and the Diffusion of Board Independence in U.S. CorporationsAdministrative Science Quarterly, 1997
- Understanding Our Differences: Performance in Decision-Making Groups with Diverse MembersHuman Relations, 1994
- The chief executive: A breed apartStrategic Management Journal, 1989
- Social Identity Theory and the OrganizationAcademy of Management Review, 1989
- Gender and power in organizations: A longitudinal perspective.Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top ManagersAcademy of Management Review, 1984