Sociological Theory and the Human Relations School
- 1 November 1976
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociology of Work and Occupations
- Vol. 3 (4) , 379-410
- https://doi.org/10.1177/009392857634001
Abstract
There are three common and influential approaches to the work of the human relations school extant in the literature. These three approaches, though superficially plausible, actually give rise to serious misconceptions about the nature of the work of this school, as well as to faulty interpretations of its development and demise. After identifying and criticising these inadequate approaches, this paper proceeds to offer a new account of the work of this group of writers based on a more adequate methodology for assessing ideas. This approach sees ideas as being applied to a developing "problem context," itself changing in response to the process of research. Finally, it is argued that the results of this reassessment have implications not only for our understanding of the work of the human relations school, but also for the practice of industrial sociology today.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- ELTON MAY0 REVISITEDBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1974
- The Harvard “Pareto circle”Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 1968
- The Hawthorne Studies: A Radical CriticismAmerican Sociological Review, 1967
- In Search of the True ParetoBritish Journal of Sociology, 1963
- The Use and Abuse of Pareto in Industrial SociologyThe American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 1955
- Sociological Theory and Industrial SociologySocial Forces, 1955
- Value, Theory, and Fact in Industrial SociologyAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1953
- The Social and Historical Philosophy of Elton Mayo [with Comment]The Antioch Review, 1950
- Philosophy Underlying the Hawthorne InvestigationSocial Forces, 1949
- Routine Interaction and the Problem of CollaborationAmerican Sociological Review, 1939