Views of American Oncologists About the Purposes of Clinical Trials
Open Access
- 18 December 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 94 (24) , 1847-1853
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/94.24.1847
Abstract
Background: Many research subjects believe incorrectly that the primary purpose of clinical trials is to benefit the participants rather than to improve therapy for future patients. However, few data are available about how physicians view trials. Methods: We mailed surveys to a stratified random sample (n = 1120) of U.S. medical, pediatric, and other oncology specialists who were selected from the American Society of Clinical Oncology Membership Directory. Respondents were asked to select, from a list of options, their reasons for enrolling individual patients in trials and what they thought the main societal purposes of clinical trials are. We used logistic regression models to evaluate which demographic and clinical practice characteristics were associated with responses to these questions. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Of the 547 physicians (48.8%) who responded, 40.5% of the medical oncologists, 32.3% of the pediatric oncologists, and 62.6% of the other oncology subspecialists reported enrolling individual patients in clinical trials to improve future therapy. Most of the other respondents reported enrolling patients to ensure that they received state-of-the-art treatment. When asked about the main societal purpose of clinical trials, 72.7% of the medical oncologists, 59.4% of the pediatric oncologists, and 81.9% of the other oncology subspecialists cited improving future therapy; most of the other respondents cited ensuring state-of-the-art treatment for participants. In multivariable analysis, medical oncologists (odds ratio [OR] = 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.3 to 0.9) and pediatric oncologists (OR = 0.3, 95% CI = 0.2 to 0.5) were less likely than other oncologists to identify improving future therapy as the main societal purpose of clinical trials, whereas industry physicians (OR = 4.6, 95% CI = 1.1 to 20.5) chose this option more often than physicians who did not work for industry. Conclusions: Many respondents viewed the main societal purpose of clinical trials as benefiting the participants rather than as creating generalizable knowledge to advance future therapy. This view, which was more prevalent among specialists such as pediatric oncologists that enrolled greater proportions of patients in trials, conflicts with established principles of research ethics.Keywords
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is Placebo Surgery Unethical?New England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Quality of informed consent in cancer clinical trials: a cross-sectional surveyThe Lancet, 2001
- Quality of Informed Consent: a New Measure of Understanding Among Research SubjectsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2001
- World Medical Association Declaration of HelsinkiJAMA, 2000
- What Makes Clinical Research Ethical?JAMA, 2000
- Professional Integrity in Clinical ResearchPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1998
- Research Ethics and the Medical Profession: Report of the Advisory Committee on Human Radiation ExperimentsJAMA, 1996
- Representation of African-Americans, Hispanics, and Whites in National Cancer Institute Cancer Treatment TrialsJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1996
- Information disclosure, subject understanding, and informed consent in psychiatric research.Law and Human Behavior, 1988
- The therapeutic misconception: Informed consent in psychiatric researchInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 1982