A comparison of stages IB1 and IB2 cervical cancers treated with radical hysterectomy. Is size the real difference?
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Gynecologic Oncology
- Vol. 95 (1) , 70-76
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.07.027
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Randomised study of radical surgery versus radiotherapy for stage Ib-IIa cervical cancerThe Lancet, 1997
- Surgically defined prognostic parameters in patients with early cervical carcinoma: A multivariate survival tree analysisCancer, 1996
- The influence of tumor size and morphology on the outcome of patients with figo stage IB squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervixInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics, 1994
- Effect of tumor size on the prognosis of carcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with irradiation aloneCancer, 1992
- Multivariate analysis of the histopathologic prognostic factors of cervical cancer in patients undergoing radical hysterectomyCancer, 1992
- Carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation therapy I. A multi-variate analysis of prognostic variables in the gynecologic oncology groupCancer, 1991
- A prospective surgical pathological study of stage I squamous carcinoma of the cervix: A Gynecologic Oncology Group studyGynecologic Oncology, 1989
- Identification of prognostic factors and risk groups in patients found to have nodal metastasis at the time of radical hysterectomy for early-stage squamous carcinoma of the cervixGynecologic Oncology, 1989
- Histologic grade and lymph node metastasis in squamous cell carcinoma of the cervixGynecologic Oncology, 1981
- Prognostic factors in cervical carcinoma: Implications in staging and managementCancer, 1981