Anxiety, Cognitive Development, and Correspondence
- 1 June 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
- Vol. 14 (2) , 221-230
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167288142001
Abstract
Subjects (N = 261) blocked on their levels of trait anxiety and cognitive development were asked to make causal attributions to account for another person's failure on a task and to prescribe ways to improve the individual's subsequent performance. Subjects at the formal-operational stage and low and moderate levels of trait anxiety showed reliable attribution-behavior prescription correspondence; formal-operational individuals with high trait anxiety and subjects at lower levels of cognitive development showed no consistent relationships between their attributions and subsequent behavioral prescriptions.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attributions and attribution–behavior relations: The effect of level of cognitive development.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987
- Covariation information, causal questioning, and interpersonal behaviorJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1986
- Personality, motivation, and performance: A theory of the relationship between individual differences and information processing.Psychological Review, 1984
- Causal attributions and information seeking to explain success and failureJournal of Research in Personality, 1976
- Cue utilization and attributional judgments for success and failureJournal of Personality, 1971
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal ScalesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1960
- The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior.Psychological Review, 1959
- The growth of logical thinking: From childhood to adolescence.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1958
- The psychology of interpersonal relations.Published by American Psychological Association (APA) ,1958