Chorionic villus sampling: Diagnostic uses and limitations of enzyme assays

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Summary: Control ranges for enzymes in uncultured chorionic villi were established, based on: (1) 21 of 22 enzymes (mainly lysosomal) in villi had similar properties to the enzyme in cultured fibroblasts; (2) isoenzyme patterns in villi were similar to those in fibroblasts for five lysosomal enzymes but different for aryl sulphatases; (3) control ranges were determined for 12 enzymes in abortion villi and for 21 enzymes in biopsy villi, values tending to be higher in the latter for those enzymes studied in both types of sample; (4) storage of samples under various conditions revealed no major changes in activity of seven lysosomal enzymes.A number of potential pitfalls in the use of chorionic villus samples for diagnosis of metabolic disorders by enzyme assay are described: (1) the presence of aryl sulphatase C in chorionic villi, an isoenzyme which may interfere in assays of aryl sulphatase A; (2) the presence of maternal enzyme in chorionic villus material illustrated by the detection of the A isoenzyme of B‐hexosaminidase in chorionic villus from a pregnancy affected with Sandhoff's disease; (3) the finding of falsely normal levels of α‐iduronidase in chorionic villus samples from a pregnancy affected with Hurler's disease, probably due to contamination with maternal tissue which has relatively high levels of this enzyme compared with fetal chorionic material: (4) the inadequacy of indirect assays of incorporation of radiolabel into macromolecules using chorionic villi, for example [14C]propionate incorporation for prenatal diagnosis of methylmalonic aciduria.Provided that such pitfalls are recognized and great care is taken in selection of villus samples and interpretation of results, chorionic villus sampling allows reliable prenatal diagnosis of a large number of disorders using enzyme asays.