Volume and Outcome in Hospital Care: Evidence, Explanations and Implications
- 1 July 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Health Services Management Research
- Vol. 3 (2) , 108-114
- https://doi.org/10.1177/095148489000300205
Abstract
The relationship between the volume of work undertaken in a hospital and the outcome of care has assumed increasing importance in recent years. A review of the literature reveals that most studies have been carried out in the USA and have largely been confined to six specific areas of health care. There is evidence that better outcomes are obtained at higher volumes for several surgical operations, cardiac catheterisation and care of the severely injured. As yet there is no clear association for coronary, neo-natal and burn care. There are two competing hypotheses to explain any association — ‘practice-makes-perfect’ and ‘selective referral’. These are discussed and implications for the future provision of hospital services considered.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Practice Make Perfect?Medical Care, 1984
- Trauma mortality in Orange County: The effect of implementation of a regional trauma systemAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 1984
- Newborn Intensive Care and Neonatal Mortality in Low-Birth-Weight InfantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- The Relation Between Surgical Volume and Mortality: An Exploration of Causal Factors and Alternative ModelsMedical Care, 1980
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- Regional organisation of neonatal intensive care in the North-westBMJ, 1979
- REGIONAL CATEGORIZATION AND QUALITY OF CARE IN MAJOR TRAUMAPublished by Wolters Kluwer Health ,1977
- Evaluation of Burn Care in FloridaNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- The Complications of Coronary ArteriographyCirculation, 1973
- Case-fatality in Teaching and Non-teaching Hospitals 1956–59Medical Care, 1963