Antimicrobial prescribing patterns for respiratory diseases including tuberculosis in Russia: a possible role in drug resistance?
Open Access
- 1 September 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Vol. 54 (3) , 673-679
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkh383
Abstract
Background: Inappropriate antibiotic prescribing exposes patients to the risk of side effects and encourages the development of drug resistance across antimicrobial groups used for respiratory infections including tuberculosis (TB). Aim: Determine among Russian general practitioners and specialists: (1) sources of antimicrobial prescribing information; (2) patterns of antimicrobial prescribing for common respiratory diseases and differences between primary and specialist physicians; (3) whether drug resistance in TB might be linked to over-prescribing of anti-TB drugs for respiratory conditions. Methods: Point-prevalence cross-sectional survey involving all 28 primary care, general medicine and TB treatment institutions in Samara City, Russian Federation. In this two-stage study, a questionnaire was used to examine doctors' antimicrobial (including TB drugs) prescribing habits, sources of prescribing information, management of respiratory infections and a case scenario (‘common cold’). This was followed by a case note review of actual prescribing for consecutive patients with respiratory diseases at three institutions. Results: Initial questionnaires were completed by 81.3% (425/523) of physicians with 78.4% working in primary care. Most doctors used standard textbooks to guide their antimicrobial practice but 80% made extensive use of pharmaceutical company information. A minority of 1.7% would have inappropriately prescribed antibiotics for the case and 0.8–1.8% of respondents would have definitely prescribed TB drugs for non-TB conditions. Of the 495 respiratory cases, 25% of doctors prescribed an antibiotic for a simple upper respiratory tract infection and of 8 patients with a clinical diagnosis of TB, 4 received rifampicin monotherapy alone. Ciprofloxacin was widely but inappropriately used. Conclusion: Doctors rely on information provided by pharmaceutical companies; there was inappropriate antibiotic prescribing.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Update of Practice Guidelines for the Management of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Immunocompetent AdultsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2003
- Medical journals and pharmaceutical companies: uneasy bedfellowsBMJ, 2003
- Antibiotics for the common cold and acute purulent rhinitisPublished by Wiley ,2002
- Antistreptococcal Activity of Telithromycin Compared with Seven Other Drugs in Relation to Macrolide Resistance Mechanisms in RussiaAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2002
- Patients' Interviews and Misuse of AntibioticsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Promoting Appropriate Antimicrobial Drug Use: Perspective from the Centers for Disease Control and PreventionClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- Surveillance of antibiotic resistance in European ICUsJournal of Hospital Infection, 2001
- Rheumatic fever—is it still a problem?Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2000
- ERS Task Force Report. Guidelines for management of adult community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections. European Respiratory SocietyEuropean Respiratory Journal, 1998
- To prescribe - or not to prescribe - antibiotics: District physicians’ habits vary greatly, and are difficult to changeScandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care, 1995