A Quantitative Comparison of Unipolar and Augmented Unipolar Limb Leads
- 1 April 1950
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Circulation
- Vol. 1 (4) , 954-963
- https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.1.4.954
Abstract
Goldberger has claimed that his augmented unipolar limb leads (aV) are identical—except for a 50 per cent larger amplitude—and interchangeable with Wilson's original V leads, but this claim was not supported by quantitative evidence. The advantage of larger amplitudes explains the increasing preference for the aV leads. A quantitative comparison between V and aV leads revealed such tremendous variability of the augmentation ratio, both interindividual and between leads in the same individual, that standards obtained with V leads are not applicable to aV leads and vice versa. V leads and aV leads are not interchangeable.This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variability of the electrocardiogram in normal young menAmerican Heart Journal, 1949
- An analysis of the relative accuracies of the Wilson and Goldberger methods for registering unipolar and augmented unipolar electrocardiographic leadsAmerican Heart Journal, 1949
- Unipolar electrocardiographic leadsAmerican Heart Journal, 1949
- The relation of unipolar limb leads to precordial and esophageal leadsAmerican Heart Journal, 1948
- An analysis of causes of right axis deviation based partly on endocardial potentials of the hypertrophied right ventricleAmerican Heart Journal, 1948
- The precordial electrocardiogramAmerican Heart Journal, 1943
- The aVl, aVr, and aVf leads: A simplification of standard lead electrocardiographyAmerican Heart Journal, 1942
- A simple, indifferent, electrocardiographic electrode of zero potential and a technique of obtaining augmented, unipolar, extremity leadsAmerican Heart Journal, 1942
- Zur Frage der unipolaren Ableitung des ElektrokardiogrammsBasic Research in Cardiology, 1938
- Electrocardiograms that represent the potential variations of a single electrodeAmerican Heart Journal, 1934