Vividness of visual imagery and source memory for audio and text
- 21 December 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Applied Cognitive Psychology
- Vol. 16 (1) , 87-95
- https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.755
Abstract
Two groups of high and low vivid imagers heard an audiotape of a crime, read an account of it with both correct and new information, then took recognition and source memory tests. While listening and reading, both groups were told to attend carefully, but one was also instructed to form visual images of the scene. Recognition memory accuracy was greater for material from the text only than from the audio only, whereas source memory accuracy was greater for audio than for text. For source memory of text, high imagers performed more poorly than low imagers under imagery instructions. These results replicate previous work and extend it from an initial film source to an audio source. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Toward a Psychology of Memory AccuracyAnnual Review of Psychology, 2000
- Repeated Exposure to Suggestion and the Creation of False MemoriesPsychological Science, 1996
- The recollective experience of cross-modality confusion errorsMemory & Cognition, 1995
- Imagery ability and source monitoring: Implications for eyewitness memoryBritish Journal of Psychology, 1993
- Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin, 1993
- The eyewitness suggestibility effect and memory for sourceMemory & Cognition, 1989
- Misled subjects may know more than their performance implies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1989
- Why does vivid imagery hurt colour memory?Canadian Journal of Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie, 1986
- VISUAL IMAGERY DIFFERENCES IN THE RECALL OF PICTURESBritish Journal of Psychology, 1973