A comparative study of films and screens for mammography
- 1 January 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in The British Journal of Radiology
- Vol. 60 (709) , 73-78
- https://doi.org/10.1259/0007-1285-60-709-73
Abstract
Ten films and six screens suitable for mammography have been compared for image quality using a realistic quantitative phantom under controlled conditions. The best screen was Min R (Kodak), but three black and white films, Min R (Kodak), Fuji II NC (Fuji) and MR3 (Agfa-Gevaert), scored highly. Patient dose was also considered and, with these three films, a small gains in image quality were balanced by small increase in dose. Medichrome Blue film, however, gave the highest score of all, and did so for a dose that was less than the highest. These results were confirmed on a second phantom of entirely different design.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHYThe Lancet, 1985
- The usefulness of a moving grid in mammographyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1985
- REDUCTION OF BREAST CANCER MORTALITY THROUGH MASS SCREENING WITH MODERN MAMMOGRAPHYThe Lancet, 1984
- Mammographic practice and dosimetry in BritainThe British Journal of Radiology, 1981
- A test object for assessing image quality in mammographyThe British Journal of Radiology, 1980