DEEP STRUCTURE AND ORIGIN OF THE NORTHUMBERLAND AND STAINMORE TROUGHS
- 1 February 1984
- journal article
- Published by Geological Society of London in Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological and Polytechnic Society
- Vol. 44 (4) , 479-495
- https://doi.org/10.1144/pygs.44.4.479
Abstract
SUMMARY: The Lower Carboniferous trough and block structures of northern England were discovered and delineated by geological and gravity observations. New information on the depth to the underlying basement comes from seismic refraction studies using quarry blasts, and from observations of the LISPB shots of 1974 along a north-south line of temporary stations from the Northumberland Trough to the Craven Basin (the NERL line). In agreement with earlier gravity interpretations, this new seismic evidence shows that the Northumberland Trough is about 3–4 km deep beneath north-eastern England, and that the Stainmore Trough is about 2.5 km deep across the Pennines. Seismic data from NERL and from the Rookhope array station indicate a 6.5 km s −1 layer at about 12 km depth and the Moho at about 28 km depth. To within the accuracy attained, the Moho appears to be at the same depth beneath both blocks and troughs. The regional and differential subsidence are both primarily attributed to stretching of the lithosphere (including crust) in a north-south direction. The lithospheric tension was probably mainly caused by the slabpull force (or trench suction?) resulting from subduction of the attached oceanic part of the plate which formed the closing Hercynian marginal sea to the south, supplemented in the continental crust by tension related to the crustal thickness. It is suggested that the ductile lower part of the lithosphere, including the lower continental crust, was stretched to a much greater extent than the strong and brittle uppermost layer as a result of resistance to subduction at shallow depth. The regional subsidence was partly the isostatic response to thinning of the lower ductile part of the continental crust; subordinate thermal subsidence probably contributed, but this was cut short by a new thermal event at the end of the Carboniferous. Differential subsidence is attributed to faulting in the upper continental crust in response to the tension. This allowed the buoyant granites to remain relatively stable as the intervening regions subsided, with the Moho shallowing regionally but not developing strong local variations in depth.This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Formation of sedimentary basins of graben type by extension of the continental crustPublished by Elsevier ,2003
- Origin of the lithospheric tension causing basin formationPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 1982
- VISÉAN LOWER YOREDALE LIMESTONES ON THE ALSTON AND ASKRIGG BLOCKS, AND THE BASE OF THE D 2 ZONE IN NORTHERN ENGLANDProceedings of the Yorkshire Geological and Polytechnic Society, 1975
- On the Relative Importance of the Driving Forces of Plate MotionGeophysical Journal International, 1975
- Stress Systems at Young Continental MarginsNature Physical Science, 1972
- GEOPHYSICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE NORTHERN PENNINE BASEMENT ROCKSProceedings of the Yorkshire Geological and Polytechnic Society, 1967
- A Crustal Study in the Vicinity of the Eskdalemuir Seismological Array StationGeophysical Journal International, 1964
- A GRAVITY SURVEY OFF THE COAST OF NORTH-EAST ENGLANDProceedings of the Yorkshire Geological and Polytechnic Society, 1961
- The geological interpretation of a gravity survey of the Alston Block and the Durham CoalfieldQuarterly Journal of the Geological Society, 1957
- Gravity Measurements in Durham and NorthumberlandGeological Magazine, 1953