Infection Rate for Single Lumen v Triple Lumen Subclavian Catheters
- 1 April 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
- Vol. 9 (4) , 154-158
- https://doi.org/10.1086/645820
Abstract
An infection rate was calculated for all subclavian catheters inserted during a 12-month period. The overall, single lumen, and triple lumen infection rates were 1.7% (42/2,431), 0.4% (8/1,936), and 6.9% (34/495), respectively. After excluding single lumen catheters in patients in a surgical cardiovascular unit who appeared to have a decreased risk of infection, the overall, single lumen, and triple lumen rates were 3.7% (42/1,140), 1.2% (8/645), and 6.9% (34/495), respectively. Within this group, 11.8% (281237) of the catheters used for total parenteral nutrition (TPN) were infected, whereas 1.6% (14/903) of the non-TPN catheters were infected. Of patients receiving total parental nutrition through a triple lumen catheter, 14.5% (25/172) became infected, whereas 4.6% (3/65) of the patients receiving total parental nutrition through a single lumen catheter became infected. Single and triple lumen patient groups appeared comparable based on average age, death rate, immunosuppression, underlying disease, and duration of catheterization, but the risk of infection was approximately three times greater for patients receiving total parental nutrition through a triple lumen catheter.This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Prospective Evaluation of Single and Triple Lumen Catheters in Total Parenteral NutritionJournal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 1987
- Sepsis From Triple- vs Single-Lumen Catheters During Total Parenteral Nutrition in Surgical or Critically Ill PatientsArchives of Surgery, 1986
- Comparison of the sterility of long-term central venous catheterization using single lumen, triple lumen, and pulmonary artery cathetersCritical Care Medicine, 1984
- A Semiquantitative Culture Method for Identifying Intravenous-Catheter-Related InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977