Mortality patterns among very preterm babies: a comparative analysis of two European regions in France and England
- 1 September 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by BMJ in Archives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal
- Vol. 92 (5) , 356-360
- https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2006.097683
Abstract
Objective: To explore the differences in outcome of very preterm pregnancies between two geographically defined populations in Europe with similar socioeconomic characteristics and healthcare provision but different organisational arrangements for perinatal care. Design: Prospective cohort study. Setting: Nord Pas-de-Calais (NPC), France, and Trent, UK. Participants: All pregnancy outcomes 22(+0) to 32(+6) weeks' gestational age for resident mothers. Outcome measures: Mortality patterns (antepartum death, intrapartum death, labour ward death and neonatal unit death) among very preterm babies were analysed by region. Multinomial logistic regression was used to model regional differences for a variety of pregnancy outcomes and to adjust for regional differences in the organisation of perinatal care. Results: Delivery of very preterm infants was significantly higher in Trent compared with NPC (1.9% v 1.5% of all births, respectively (p<0.001)). Stillbirth rate was significantly higher in NPC than in Trent (23.0%, 95% CI 20.0% to 26.5% v 14.4%, 95% CI 12.3% to 16.6%, respectively (p<0.001)) and survival to discharge was higher in Trent than in NPC (74.6%, 95% CI 71.9% to 77.1% v 66.7%, 95% CI 63.3% to 69.9%, respectively (p<0.001)). Probability of intrapartum and labour ward death in NPC was more than five times higher than Trent (relative risk 5.3, 95% CI 2.2 to 13.1 (p<0.001)). Conclusion: The high rate of very preterm deliveries and the larger proportion of these infants recorded as live born in Trent appear to be the cause of the excess neonatal mortality seen in the routine statistics. Information about very preterm babies (not usually included in routine statistics) is vital to avoid inappropriate interpretation of international perinatal and infant data. This study highlights the importance of including deaths before transfer to neonatal care and emphasises the need to include the outcome of all pregnancies in a population in any comparative analysis.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort studyArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 2004
- Preterm birth in a French population: the importance of births by medical decision.2003
- Preterm birth in a French population: the importance of births by medical decisionBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2003
- Differences in perinatal mortality and suboptimal care between 10 European regions: results of an international audit.2003
- Extreme prematurity in the UK and Denmark: population differences in viabilityArchives of Disease in Childhood: Fetal & Neonatal, 2002
- The influence of prenatal screening and termination of pregnancy on perinatal mortality ratesPrenatal Diagnosis, 2002
- Different Policies on Prenatal Ultrasound Screening Programmes and Induced Abortions Explain Regional Variations in Infant Mortality with Congenital MalformationsFetal Diagnosis and Therapy, 2001
- End-of-life decisions in neonatal intensive care: physicians' self-reported practices in seven European countriesThe Lancet, 2000
- Outcome of neonates transported between Level III centres depends upon centre of careJournal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 1994
- Inborn/outborn status and neonatal survival: A meta‐analysis of non‐randomized studiesStatistics in Medicine, 1988