Remeasuring Business Cycles
- 1 September 1994
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 54 (3) , 573-609
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700015047
Abstract
This article evaluates the consistency of the NBER business cycle reference dates. It finds that the early reference dates are derived from detrended data, whereas the dates after 1927 are derived from data in levels. To evaluate the importance of this and other changes in technique, I derive a simple algorithm that matches the postwar NBER peaks and troughs closely. When this algorithm is applied to data for 1884 to 1940, the new prewar dates differ systematically from the NBER dates and challenge the conventional view that recessions have gotten shorter over time.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Macroeconomic Consequences of Bank Failures under the National Banking SystemExplorations in Economic History, 1993
- Business Cycle Durations and Postwar Stabilization of the U.S. EconomyPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1992
- A New Monthly Index of Industrial Production, 1884–1940The Journal of Economic History, 1990
- The Prewar Business Cycle Reconsidered: New Estimates of Gross National Product, 1869-1908Journal of Political Economy, 1989
- The Changing Cyclical Behavior of Wages and Prices: 1890-1976Published by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1978
- How Good are the National Bureau's Reference Dates?The Journal of Business, 1963