Predicting the future burden of cancer
Top Cited Papers
- 22 December 2005
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Springer Nature in Nature Reviews Cancer
- Vol. 6 (1) , 63-74
- https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc1781
Abstract
As observations in the past do not necessarily hold into the future, predicting future cancer occurrence is fraught with uncertainty. Nevertheless, predictions can aid health planners in allocating resources and allow scientists to explore the consequence of interventions aimed at reducing the impact of cancer. Simple statistical models have been refined over the past few decades and often provide reasonable predictions when applied to recent trends. Intrinsic to their interpretation, however, is an understanding of the forces that drive time trends. We explain how and why cancer predictions are made, with examples to illustrate the concepts in practice.Keywords
This publication has 57 references indexed in Scilit:
- Trends in Cervical Squamous Cell Carcinoma Incidence in 13 European Countries: Changing Risk and the Effects of ScreeningCancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 2005
- Projecting cancer incidence and mortality using Bayesian age–period–cohort modelsJournal of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, 2001
- Grappling with Cancer — Defeatism versus the Reality of ProgressNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- The Future Cancer Burden as a Study SubjectActa Oncologica, 1996
- Precision of incidence predictions based on poisson distributed observationsStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Bayesian analysis of survival on multiple time scalesStatistics in Medicine, 1994
- Are we winning the fight against cancer? An epidemiological assessmentEuropean Journal of Cancer and Clinical Oncology, 1990
- Progress against Cancer?New England Journal of Medicine, 1986
- Using Age, Period and Cohort Models to Estimate Future Mortality RatesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1985
- A mathematical model for the age distribution of cancer in manInternational Journal of Cancer, 1969