ROBUSTNESS OF CLOSED CAPTURE–RECAPTURE METHODS TO VIOLATIONS OF THE CLOSURE ASSUMPTION
- 1 December 1999
- Vol. 80 (8) , 2517-2525
- https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[2517:roccrm]2.0.co;2
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- ESTIMATION OF TIGER DENSITIES IN INDIA USING PHOTOGRAPHIC CAPTURES AND RECAPTURESEcology, 1998
- NATAL AND BREEDING PHILOPATRY IN A BLACK BRANT,BRANTA BERNICLA NIGRICANS,METAPOPULATIONEcology, 1998
- ESTIMATING SPECIES RICHNESS: THE IMPORTANCE OF HETEROGENEITY IN SPECIES DETECTABILITYEcology, 1998
- APPLICATION OF MARK–RECAPTURE MODELS TO ESTIMATION OF THE POPULATION SIZE OF PLANTSEcology, 1997
- ESTIMATING TEMPORARY EMIGRATION USING CAPTURE–RECAPTURE DATA WITH POLLOCK’S ROBUST DESIGNEcology, 1997
- On the use of secondary capture-recapture samples to estimate temporary emigration and breeding proportionsJournal of Applied Statistics, 1995
- Estimating the Number of Species: A ReviewJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1993
- Parsimonious Modelling of Capture-Mark-Recapture StudiesPublished by JSTOR ,1985
- Aerial-Visibility Bias and Survey Techniques for Nesting Bald Eagles in Northwestern OntarioThe Journal of Wildlife Management, 1981
- Robust Estimation of Population Size When Capture Probabilities Vary Among AnimalsEcology, 1979