The Strategic Use of Quality Circles in Australian Industrial Relations
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Industrial Relations
- Vol. 29 (2) , 150-168
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002218568702900202
Abstract
Quality circles represent one of the most interesting employee participation initiatives of the I980s. According to their advocates they improve industrial relations, increase productivity and improve product quality. Quality circles were developed in Japan and embody some fundamental principles of Japanese management. Outside Japan, however, quality circles have had a consistently high failure rate, leading some commentators to suggest that they have a distinct life cycle. This article examines this contention by comparing the operation of quality circles in two divisions of a large manufacturing company in Australia and noting the factors that contributed to success and failure. It concludes that quality circles were used strategically in both cases to help introduce a more participative management style. The impact of quality circles on the existing pattern of industrial relations is assessed, particularly the changes in relations between the major groups in the organization, the response of the unions to the programmes and their effect on the supervisors.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Board size—Can it prevent corporate failure?Omega, 1986
- Quality circle failures in UK manufacturing companies—A study. Part IIOmega, 1984
- ‘AFTER JAPAN’: THE QUALITY CIRCLE TRANSPLANT AND PRODUCTIVE EFFICIENCYBritish Journal of Industrial Relations, 1983
- Evaluating Quality Circles: The American ApplicationCalifornia Management Review, 1983