Intended and unintended effects of explicit warnings on eyewitness suggestibility: Evidence from source identification tests
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Memory & Cognition
- Vol. 29 (8) , 1120-1129
- https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03206381
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Source Memory and Eyewitness Suggestibility in Older AdultsThe Journal of General Psychology, 1999
- Memory suggestibility as an example of the sleeper effectPsychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1998
- Test formats change source-monitoring decision processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1998
- Aging, source, and decision criteria: When false fame errors do and do not occur.Psychology and Aging, 1995
- Misinformation and warnings in eyewitness testimony: A new testing procedure to differentiate explanationsMemory, 1993
- Misleading suggestions can impair eyewitnesses' ability to remember event details.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990
- Becoming famous overnight: Limits on the ability to avoid unconscious influences of the past.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1989
- In search of reliable persuasion effects: III. The sleeper effect is dead: Long live the sleeper effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1988
- The social psychology of eyewitness accuracy: Misleading questions and communicator expertise.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- Editing misleading information from memory: Evidence for the coexistence of original and postevent informationMemory & Cognition, 1983