Women and the Development of Drugs: Why Can't a Woman Be More Like a Man?
- 1 December 1994
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
- Vol. 736 (1) , 174-195
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1994.tb12831.x
Abstract
Most health providers and researchers would agree that the FDA provides the finest and safest methods to ensure safety and efficacy for the consumer. All proposed regulations or changes are published in the Federal Register (Title 21 Code of Federal Regulations). The 70 kg white male is no longer considered the norm. Any differences in race, gender, and ethnic composition need to be identified. Accessibility of clinical trial subjects has been a key factor in the inclusion of patients in studies as exemplified by the use of male medical students, male prison subjects, and male Veterans' Administration patients. This is no longer satisfactory; efforts now must be made to encourage and include representative women in each study. Woman scientists must now accept this challenge in education and leadership roles to ensure the proper representation of women in clinical studies.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Male-Mediated Developmental ToxicityPublished by Springer Nature ,1994
- FDA Policy on Women in Drug TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Women in Clinical Trials of New Drugs -- A Change in Food and Drug Administration PolicyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Introducing MEDWatchJAMA, 1993
- American Health QuackeryPublished by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1992
- Food and drug administration guidelines for reproductive toxicity testingReproductive Toxicology, 1988
- Discovery of New Adverse Drug ReactionsJAMA, 1984