The Experimental Infection of Macaca Mulatta with Human Strains of Entamoeba Histolytica
- 1 May 1952
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene in The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
- Vol. 1 (3) , 417-428
- https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.1952.1.417
Abstract
The studies of Dobell (1931), Kessel (1928), and others established the fact that the “histolytica-like” amebae found in monkeys are identical with E. histolytica in man. While it has been shown by many investigators that this parasite can be transmitted to a wide variety of hosts, in none of these can the infection be considered a normal one. Thus, dogs, kittens, rats, pigs, rabbits, guinea pigs and even chicks have been infected experimentally with E. histolytica. But in such cases infection is usually achieved only under special conditions. Also, the regular production of cysts is rarely seen, and it seems logical to assume that cyst-production here is good evidence of a normal host-parasite relationship For a proper understanding of the host-parasite relationships of E. histolytica the parasite must be studied in its normal host.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- PATHOLOGIC STUDY OF NATURAL AMEBIC INFECTION IN MACAQUES1946
- HOST-PARASITE RELATIONS IN EXPERIMENTAL AMOEBIASIS IN MONKEYS IN PANAMA*American Journal of Epidemiology, 1932
- A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF AMOEBIASIS IN MAN, MONKEYS AND CATS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO THE FORMATION OF THE EARLY LESIONS*American Journal of Epidemiology, 1931
- A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE INTESTINAL PROTOZOA OF WILD MONKEYS AND MAN*American Journal of Epidemiology, 1930