IS TENURE SECURE IN COMMUNAL AREAS?: SOME EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM KWAZULU-NATAL / IS GRONDBESIT IN KOMMUNALEGEBIEDE SEKER?: ENKELE EMPIRIESE BEWYSE UIT KWAZULU-NATAL
- 1 December 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Agrekon
- Vol. 34 (4) , 178-182
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03031853.1995.9524807
Abstract
This paper questions the view that tenure—defined by the breadth, duration and assurance of property rights to arable land—is secure in the communal areas of KwaZulu-Natal. It also questions the view that new technology induces a predictable shift in tenure institutions, resulting in more exclusive property rights to land. Data collected in the Upper Tugela region and irrigation scheme at Tugela Ferry suggests that households do not have secure tenure and that technical change had not induced a shift toward more exclusive land rights. Consequently, emerging farmers have Iittle incentive to farm in communal areas.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Property rights and productivity in Africa: Is there a connection?Development Southern Africa, 1994
- Can sacred cows be culled? A historical review of land policy in South Africa, with some questions about the futureDevelopment Southern Africa, 1987
- LAND RIGHTS SYSTEMS AND AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT IN SUB-SAHARAN AFRICAThe World Bank Research Observer, 1987
- The Development of Individual Rights to Property in Tribal AfricaThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1979
- Economic Analysis, the Legal Framework and Land Tenure SystemsThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1972