In Praise of Political Science
- 1 January 1957
- journal article
- Published by Project MUSE in World Politics
- Vol. 9 (2) , 240-253
- https://doi.org/10.2307/2008881
Abstract
Is anyone's esteem for political science better suppressed than a political scientist's? Ordinary modesty is admirable, but his is professionally destructive. For, not only hiding his light under a bushel, he follows the more nihilistic course of blowing it out. Granted that many political scientists neither deprecate their discipline nor permit a low regard for it to stultify their work, I have been repeatedly assured by members of the profession that no social science is more retarded and none less promising for systematic theory. Thus they hide—even from their own eyes—their discipline's accomplishments. This I shall try to show, offering two books as evidence. There is other evidence, too. When even politically ignorant undergraduates complain that the major in political science is thin, no imaginable poverty of the field explains enough. Such a phenomenon proves concealment, either deliberate or unintended.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Democracy and the American Party SystemThe Western Political Quarterly, 1956
- The theory of decision making.Psychological Bulletin, 1954
- Price Theory and OligopolyThe Economic Journal, 1947