Electronic monitoring: Adherence assessment or intervention?
- 2 February 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in HIV Research & Clinical Practice
- Vol. 3 (1) , 45-51
- https://doi.org/10.1310/xgxu-fudk-a9qt-mptf
Abstract
PURPOSE: Electronic-monitored adherence is often used as the primary outcome measure for evaluating adherence interventions. However, electronic monitoring may not only measure adherence, but may also improve or impede adherence, making it difficult to assess the extent to which the observed effect size is attributed to the intervention versus electronic monitoring. This study examined whether electronic monitoring and patient diaries alter as well as measure adherence. METHOD: A sample of 180 patients on highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) were randomized to one of three adherence surveillance methods (electronic monitoring caps, patient medication diaries, no surveillance control group) for 4 weeks, with adherence measured by a structured interview at baseline and study endpoint; 173 (96%) participants completed the study. RESULTS: After controlling for baseline adherence, a univariate analyses of adherence at study endpoint revealed no significant differences across groups, F(2, 169) = 0.32, p = .73, with mean adherence rates of 91.4, 92.4, and 93.8 for the electronic monitoring, diaries, and control group, respectively. Similarly, the proportion of participants with good adherence (≥95%) did not differ significantly from baseline to week 4 among all three subgroups. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that electronic monitoring caps and medication diaries do not alter adherence and can be used as outcome measures of interventions without the need to adjust the observed effect size. PDF Keywords adherence, diaries, electronic monitoring Related articles View all related articles var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; var addthis_config = {"data_track_addressbar":true,"ui_click":true}; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/XGXU-FUDK-A9QT-MPTF Download Citation Recommend to: A friendKeywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence and Viral Suppression in HIV‐Infected Drug Users: Comparison of Self‐Report and Electronic MonitoringClinical Infectious Diseases, 2001
- AIDS — The First 20 YearsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Comparing Objective Measures of Adherence to HIV Antiretroviral Therapy: Electronic Medication Monitors and Unannounced Pill CountsAIDS and Behavior, 2001
- Adherence to Protease Inhibitor Therapy and Outcomes in Patients with HIV InfectionAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2000
- Adherence to protease inhibitors, HIV-1 viral load, and development of drug resistance in an indigent populationAIDS, 2000
- Patient Self‐Reporting of Compliance Does Not Correspond with Electronic Monitoring: An Evaluation Using Isosorbide Dinitrate as a Model DrugPharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy, 1997
- Noncompliance and treatment failure in children with asthmaJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1996
- Short-term compliance with peak flow monitoring: Results from a study of inner city children with asthmaPediatric Pulmonology, 1996
- Critical Comparison of Novel and Existing Methods of Compliance Assessment During a Clinical Trial of an Oral Iron ChelatorThe Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 1994
- Compliance of patients with asthma with an experimental aerosolized medication: Implications for controlled clinical trialsJournal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 1986