Comparison of the Efficacy of Zolmitriptan and Sumatriptan: Issues in Migraine Trial Design
- 1 February 2000
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Cephalalgia
- Vol. 20 (1) , 30-38
- https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-2982.2000.00004.x
Abstract
In this international, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single attack study, ‘triptan naive’ migraine patients were randomized in an 8:8:1 ratio to receive zolmitriptan 5 mg, sumatriptan 100 mg or placebo. The all-treated analysis included 1058 patients who took study medication. The primary endpoint, complete headache response, was reported by 39%, 38% and 32% of patients treated with zolmitriptan, sumatriptan and placebo, respectively, with no significant difference between treatment groups. In patients with moderate headache at baseline, complete response was significantly greater following zolmitriptan than after placebo (48% vs. 27%; P = 0.01); there was no significant difference between sumatriptan and placebo groups (40% vs. 27%). In patients with severe baseline headache (where a greater reduction in headache intensity is required for a headache response), there was no significant difference between any groups in complete headache response rates. For secondary endpoints, active treatment groups were significantly superior to placebo for: 1-, 2- and 4-h headache response (e.g. 2-h headache response rates: zolmitriptan 59%; sumatriptan 61%; placebo 44%; P < 0.01 vs. placebo); pain-free response rates at 2 and 4 h; alleviation of nausea and vomiting; use of escape medication and restoration of normal activity. The incidence of adverse events was similar between zolmitriptan and sumatriptan groups but was slightly lower in the placebo group. The lack of difference between active treatments and placebo for complete response probably reflects the high placebo response obtained, which is probably a result of deficiencies in trial design. For example, the randomization ratio may result in high expectation of active treatment. Thus, while ethically patient exposure to placebo should be minimized, this must be balanced against the scientific rationale underpinning study design.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intensity Dependence of the Cortical Auditory Evoked Potentials as A Surrogate Marker of Central Nervous System Serotonin Transmission in Man: Demonstration of A Central Effect for the 5Ht1B/1D Agonist Zolmitriptan (311C90, Zomig®).Cephalalgia, 1997
- Pre-clinical pharmacology of zolmitriptan (Zomig™; formerly 311C90), a centrally and peripherally acting 5HT1B/1D agonist for migraineCephalalgia, 1997
- How to define the best efficacy parameters for migraineCephalalgia, 1997
- Direct Evidence for Central Sites of Action of Zolmitriptan (311C90)Cephalalgia, 1997
- Inhibition of trigeminal neurons by intravenous administration of the serotonin (5HT)1B/D receptor agonist zolmitriptan (311C90): are brain stem sites therapeutic target in migraine ?Pain, 1996
- Prevalence and Sex-Ratio of the Subtypes of MigraineInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1995
- Epidemiology of HeadacheCephalalgia, 1995
- SumatriptanDrugs, 1994
- Prevalence of Migraine Headache in the United StatesJAMA, 1992
- Methodology of Clinical Trials of Sumatriptan in Migraine and Cluster HeadacheEuropean Neurology, 1991