The Effect of Viewing Eccentricity on Enumeration
Open Access
- 10 June 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 6 (6) , e20779
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0020779
Abstract
Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity progressively diminish with increasing viewing eccentricity. Here we evaluated how visual enumeration is affected by visual eccentricity, and whether subitizing capacity, the accurate enumeration of a small number (∼3) of items, decreases with more eccentric viewing. Participants enumerated gratings whose (1) stimulus size was constant across eccentricity, and (2) whose stimulus size scaled by a cortical magnification factor across eccentricity. While we found that enumeration accuracy and precision decreased with increasing eccentricity, cortical magnification scaling of size neutralized the deleterious effects of increasing eccentricity. We found that size scaling did not affect subitizing capacities, which were nearly constant across all eccentricities. We also found that size scaling modulated the variation coefficients, a normalized metric of enumeration precision, defined as the standard deviation divided by the mean response. Our results show that the inaccuracy and imprecision associated with increasing viewing eccentricity is due to limitations in spatial resolution. Moreover, our results also support the notion that the precise number system is restricted to small numerosities (represented by the subitizing limit), while the approximate number system extends across both small and large numerosities (indexed by variation coefficients) at large eccentricities.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spatial-frequency and contrast properties of reading in central and peripheral visionJournal of Vision, 2009
- Amblyopia masks the scale invariance of normal central visionJournal of Vision, 2009
- Modulating Attentional Load Affects Numerosity Estimation: Evidence against a Pre-Attentive Subitizing MechanismPLOS ONE, 2008
- Does Subitizing Reflect Numerical Estimation?Psychological Science, 2008
- The role of attention in subitizing: Is the magical number 1?Visual Cognition, 2008
- Crowding is unlike ordinary masking: Distinguishing feature integration from detectionJournal of Vision, 2004
- Analog Numerical Representations in Rhesus Monkeys: Evidence for Parallel ProcessingJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2004
- Multiple parallel access in visual attention.Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology / Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale, 1994
- Sensitivity loss in odd-symmetric mechanisms and phase anomalies in peripheral visionNature, 1987
- Numerosity judgments in peripheral vision: Limitations of the cortical magnification hypothesisBehavioural Brain Research, 1984