Just-in-Time Information Improved Decision-Making in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Open Access
- 21 November 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS ONE
- Vol. 3 (11) , e3785
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0003785
Abstract
The “Just-in-time Information” (JIT) librarian consultation service was designed to provide rapid information to answer primary care clinical questions during patient hours. This study evaluated whether information provided by librarians to answer clinical questions positively impacted time, decision-making, cost savings and satisfaction. A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted between October 2005 and April 2006. A total of 1,889 questions were sent to the service by 88 participants. The object of the randomization was a clinical question. Each participant had clinical questions randomly allocated to both intervention (librarian information) and control (no librarian information) groups. Participants were trained to send clinical questions via a hand-held device. The impact of the information provided by the service (or not provided by the service), additional resources and time required for both groups was assessed using a survey sent 24 hours after a question was submitted. The average time for JIT librarians to respond to all questions was 13.68 minutes/question (95% CI, 13.38 to 13.98). The average time for participants to respond their control questions was 20.29 minutes/question (95% CI, 18.72 to 21.86). Using an impact assessment scale rating cognitive impact, participants rated 62.9% of information provided to intervention group questions as having a highly positive cognitive impact. They rated 14.8% of their own answers to control question as having a highly positive cognitive impact, 44.9% has having a negative cognitive impact, and 24.8% with no cognitive impact at all. In an exit survey measuring satisfaction, 86% (62/72 responses) of participants scored the service as having a positive impact on care and 72% (52/72) indicated that they would use the service frequently if it were continued. In this study, providing timely information to clinical questions had a highly positive impact on decision-making and a high approval rating from participants. Using a librarian to respond to clinical questions may allow primary care professionals to have more time in their day, thus potentially increasing patient access to care. Such services may reduce costs through decreasing the need for referrals, further tests, and other courses of action. Controlled-Trials.com ISRCTN96823810Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Financial and Work Satisfaction: Impacts of Participation in Primary Care Reform on Physicians in OntarioHealthcare Policy, 2009
- The information‐seeking behaviour of doctors: a review of the evidenceHealth Information and Libraries Journal, 2007
- The costs and effectiveness of information-skills training and mediated searching: quantitative results from the EMPIRIC projectHealth Information and Libraries Journal, 2006
- Canadian clinicians and patients need clean, clear knowledgeCMAJ : Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2006
- Physicians Answer More Clinical Questions and Change Clinical Decisions More Often With Synthesized Evidence: A Randomized Trial in Primary CareAnnals of Family Medicine, 2005
- The use of unequal randomisation ratios in clinical trials: A reviewPublished by Elsevier ,2005
- Contribution of Primary Care to Health Systems and HealthThe Milbank Quarterly, 2005
- Answering Physicians' Clinical Questions: Obstacles and Potential SolutionsJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 2005
- A clinical informaticist to support primary care decision makingQuality and Safety in Health Care, 2001
- The value of information supplied to clinicians by health libraries: devising an outcomes–based assessment of the contribution of libraries to clinical decision–makingHealth Libraries Review, 1995