Preventing fatal diseases increases healthcare costs: cause elimination life table approach

Abstract
Objectives: To examine whether elimination of fatal diseases will increase healthcare costs. Design: Mortality data from vital statistics combined with healthcare spending in a cause elimination life table. Costs were allocated to specific diseases through the various healthcare registers. Setting and subjects: The population of the Netherlands, 1988. Main outcome measures: Healthcare costs of a synthetic life table cohort, expressed as life time expected costs. Results: The life time expected healthcare costs for 1988 in the Netherlands were £56 600 for men and £80 900 for women. Elimination of fatal diseases—such as coronary heart disease, cancer, or chronic obstructive lung disease—increases health- care costs. Major savings will be achieved only by elimination of non-fatal disease—such as musculoskeletal diseases and mental disorders. Conclusion: The aim of prevention is to spare people from avoidable misery and death not to save money on the healthcare system. In countries with low mortality, elimination of fatal diseases by successful prevention increases healthcare spending because of the medical expenses during added life years. In countries with low mortality prevention of fatal diseases adds life years predominantly to old age, when disabling conditions are prevalent If fatal diseases are eliminated, the medical costs of life extension at old age will generally be higher than the costs prevented. Prevention of disabling conditions, particularly mental disorders and musculoskeletal conditions, might both lower healthcare costs and improve public health The aim of prevention is to save people from preventable morbidity and mortality not to save money For the time being, prevention of disability should have the highest priority for future research

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: