Negotiating the "Rackety Bridge" — a Dynamic Model for Aligning Supervisory Style with Research Student Development
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Higher Education Research & Development
- Vol. 20 (1) , 81-92
- https://doi.org/10.1080/07924360120043882
Abstract
Postgraduate research student supervision is examined with the aim of developing a model of the supervisory relationship to improve practice by encouraging a more proactive role for students. The term "competent autonomy" is defined and argued to be a universal objective of the PhD. A tentative "supervisor/student alignment model" based on the development of this objective is proposed. It draws upon some features of earlier models but stresses the need for a dynamic alignment of supervisory style with the student's degree of development. Operationalised as a tool and tested empirically, it was found to encourage students to periodically reflect on and discuss their needs as competent autonomy is developed. Feedback is presented from a group of PhD students with whom the tool has been used at approximately 6 monthly intervals for up to three years to deliver supervision aligned to their dynamic needs.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Common Misconceptions about Students from South‐East Asia Studying in AustraliaHigher Education Research & Development, 1997
- Thesis supervision in the social sciences: Managed or negotiated?Higher Education, 1994
- The Supervisory Process in Speech-Language Pathology and AudiologyEar & Hearing, 1988
- Dimensionality of supervisor roles: Supervisors' perceptions of supervision.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1986
- A study of Hogan's model of counselor development and supervision.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1983
- Approaching supervision from a developmental perspective: The counselor complexity model.Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1981
- Supervisor Training: A Discrimination ModelCounselor Education and Supervision, 1979
- Issues and approaches in supervision.Psychotherapy, 1964