Host-specificity of Candidate Agents for the Biological Control of Onopordum spp. Thistles in Australia: An Assessment of Testing Procedures

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
This paper describes a series of host-specificity tests carried out to evaluate the safety of eight insects for release in Australia as biological control agents of Onopordum spp. thistles; Larinus latus L., Lixus cardui Ol. and Trichosirocalus briesei Alonso-Zarazaga & Sanchez-Ruiz (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), Tephritis postica Loew and Urophora terebrans Loew (Diptera: Tephritidae), Botanophila spinosa Rondani (Diptera: Anthomyiidae), Tettigometra sulphurea Mulsant & Rey. (Hemiptera: Fulgoroidae) and Eublemma amoena (Hbn.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Preliminary tests were first carried out against key test plants in the country of origin to determine whether it was worth proceeding with formal testing under quarantine conditions in Australia. In the formal testing procedure, the test plant list was based solely on phylogenetic relationships. The life-stage of each insect tested was selected with respect to its biology and behaviour, e.g. only oviposition was tested for insect species with immobile endophagous larvae, while larval host utilization was tested for those with mobile larval stages. The initial laboratory experiments for each species used were caged no-choice tests, as confinement without choice can elicit extreme behavioural responses, making negative results extremely robust. Where positive results occurred, insects where re-exposed to the plant, but this time given a choice between the target and non-target plants. The results of these tests, plus data from open-field preliminary tests in the country of origin, helped interpret results and determine the risk posed by each candidate biological control agent to non-target plant species. Following submission, all eight candidates were approved for release by the Australian plant biosecurity and conservation authorities. Based on a comparison of the eight species tested, it is recommended that host-specificity testing be kept flexible and pragmatic, rather than moving towards a formulaic risk assessment procedure. Moreover, given the improved state of knowledge of plant phylogenies and the evolution of host utilization, it is time to base testing procedures purely on phylogenetic grounds, without the need to include less related test species solely because of economic or conservation reasons.