Need Consideration in Allocation Decisions: Is it Just?
- 1 April 1983
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 119 (2) , 205-209
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1983.9922822
Abstract
The assumption was examined that need-considering allocations follow a social responsibility norm and are in conflict with distributive justice norms. In a questionnaire experiment, 48 male Ss indicated how they would allocate money between two hypothetical persons who needed different sums of money but contributed equally toward earning the money. Experimental variations included the absence/presence of a request to allocate justly and the interpersonal attraction between the recipients. Given a just-allocation request, need consideration was found (i.e., the needier person received significantly more than half of the profit) in both attraction conditions. In the absence of a just-allocation request, need consideration was found only in the high-attraction condition.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- JUSTICE NORMS IN ALLOCATION DECISIONS: NEED CONSIDERATION AS A FUNCTION OF RESOURCE ADEQUACY FOR COMPLETE NEED SATISFACTION, RECIPIENTS' CONTRIBUTIONS, AND RECIPIENTS' INTERPERSONAL ATTRACTIONSocial Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 1981
- Norms Concerning Distributive Justice: Are Needs Taken Into Consideration in Allocation Decisions?Social Psychology Quarterly, 1980
- The justice motive: Some hypotheses as to its origins and forms1Journal of Personality, 1977
- Equity, Equality, and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?Journal of Social Issues, 1975
- Measurement of romantic love.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970
- The Use of Group Decision to Resolve a Problem of FairnessPersonnel Psychology, 1959