Risk factors predisposing to fetal loss following a second trimester amniocentesis
- 1 October 2001
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Vol. 108 (10) , 1053-1056
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2001.00246.x
Abstract
Objective To examine the influence of possible risk factors on fetal loss rate following amniocentesis.Design Retrospective analysis of case records between 1993 and 1998.Setting Fetal medicine unit of a large teaching hospital.Population One thousand and six women with singleton pregnancies formed the study group. Seven hundred and eight of them had bleeding during the current pregnancy before the procedure, while 298 had a history of three or more first trimester abortions and/or a second trimester miscarriage or termination of pregnancy. Four thousand and twenty‐four women who had amniocentesis and had no risk factors served as controls. Both groups were also classified according to maternal age. Group 1: 1610 women aged 20–34 years; Group 2: 2850 women aged 35–39 years; Group 3; 570 women > 40 years.Methods Women of both groups underwent a second trimester amniocentesis between 16 and 21 weeks of gestation. Fetal losses following amniocentesis were examined in three time intervals: 1. in the first two weeks after the procedure; 2. up to the 28th week; 3. from the 28th week to term.Results There was a statistically significant difference in the fetal loss rate between women aged 20–34 years (2.54%) and those > 40 years (5.1%). Women with a history of vaginal bleeding during the current pregnancy had a higher fetal loss rate compared with controls (6.5%vs 2.8%), which corresponds to an odds ratio of 2.4 (95% CI 1.69–3.42). A similar difference was found between the group of women with a history of previous abortions/terminations and the controls (8%vs 2.8%): OR 3.03 (95% CI 1.92–4.79).Conclusions There is a higher risk of fetal loss following amniocentesis in women > 40 years of age compared with those aged 20–34 years. Bleeding in the current pregnancy, a history of three or more first trimester abortions, a second trimester miscarriage or termination of pregnancy seem to be significant predisposing factors for fetal loss after an amniocentesis.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spontaneous fetal loss rates in a non-selected populationAmerican Journal of Medical Genetics, 2001
- Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage studyBMJ, 2000
- Causes of Fetal Death in Women of Advanced Maternal AgeObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Invasive techniques for fetal diagnosis in multiple pregnancyInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 1991
- Influence of past reproductive performance on risk of spontaneous abortion.BMJ, 1989
- Predictive values, relative risks, and overall benefits of high and low maternal serum α-fetoprotein screening in singleton pregnancies: New epidemiologic dataAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1989
- RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMENPublished by Elsevier ,1986
- One Thousand Consecutive Midtrimester AmniocentesesObstetrics & Gynecology, 1980
- Midtrimester Amniocentesis for Prenatal DiagnosisJAMA, 1976
- CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS OF HUMAN AMNIOTIC-FLUID CELLSThe Lancet, 1966