False Inhibition of an Atrial Demand Pacemaker Caused by an Insulation Defect in a Polyurethane Lead
- 1 July 1983
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 6 (4) , 834-839
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1983.tb04403.x
Abstract
A patient who had an atrial demand pacemaker (AAI) presented with irregular pacing at a routine examination 5 months after implantation. When a magnet was applied over the pulse generator regular fixed rate pacing was obtained, thus proving oversensing in the system. Reprogramming the input sensitivity level to 2.5 and 5.0 m Vdid not solve the problem. Programming the pulse generator to the triggered mode (AAT) showed acceleration of the stimulation rate but also inhibition of the system. An S‐S interval of 1260 ms was measured at a programmed interval of 857 ms (70 bpm). The pulse generator was disconnected and the intra‐atrial electrogram was recorded. This showed different spurious signals varying in morphology and amplitude. Fortunately we were able to remove the lead (Medtronic 6991‐U) from the atrial appendage. Subsequently a Helifix 12 mm AT lead was successfully implanted in the right atrial appendage and the same pulse generator was connected to the newly implanted lead. When the removed lead was examined by the manufacturer, a small tear in the insulation of the wire was defected. The dimensions of the tear were 0.1 × 0.7 mm. The tear was caused by stress corrosion cracking in the polyurefhane tubing of the lead.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- After‐Potential Oversensing by a Programmable Puise GeneratorPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1981
- Can a Demand Pacemaker Really Sense Concealed Ventricular Extrasystoles?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1981
- Pacemaker Oversensing: A Possible Example of Concealed Ventricular ExtrasystolesPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1981
- The Malfunctioning Pacemaker System. Part IIPacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1981
- Suppression of an External Demand Pacemaker by Diaphragmatic Myopotentials: A Sign of Electrode Perforation?Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 1979
- Atrial pacing from the coronary vein. Ten-year experience in 50 patients with implanted pervenous pacemakers.Circulation, 1978
- Inhibition of bipolar demand pacemaker by diaphragmatic myopotentials.Circulation, 1977
- Demand pacemaker arrhythmias caused by intermittent incomplete electrode fracture: Diagnosis with testing magnetThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1975
- Inhibition of discharge of an external demand pacemaker by an electric razorThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1971
- Effect of microwave oven on implanted cardiac pacemakerPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1970