The Doctor-Proxy Relationship: The Neglected Connection
- 1 December 1995
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Project MUSE in Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal
- Vol. 5 (4) , 289-306
- https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.0.0127
Abstract
Advance directives have been lauded by scholars and supported by professional organizations, Congress, and the United States Supreme Court. Despite this encouragement, only a small number of capable patients execute living wills or appoint health care agents. When patients do empower proxies, doctors may be uncertain about the scope of their duties and obligations to these persons who, in theory, stand in the shoes of the patient. This article argues for a conscious focus on the ethical duties, emotional supports, and guidance owed by physicians to health care agents.Keywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- How well is the patient self-determination act working?: An early assessmentThe American Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Medical Treatment Preferences of Nursing Home Residents: Relationship to Function and Concordance with Surrogate Decision‐MakersJournal of the American Geriatrics Society, 1993
- Outpatients’ attitudes and understanding regarding living willsJournal of General Internal Medicine, 1993
- The Patient Self-Determination Act: Implications for PhysiciansHospital Practice, 1992
- The Health Care Proxy and the Living WillNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- A Prospective Study of Advance Directives for Life-Sustaining CareNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Why I Don’t Have a Living WillLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1991
- Advance Medical DirectivesJAMA, 1990
- Quality of Life and Non-Treatment Decisions for Incompetent Patients: A Critique of the Orthodox ApproachLaw, Medicine and Health Care, 1989
- Patient-proxy response comparability on measures of patient health and functional statusJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988