Analyzing Team Performance: In the Eye of the Beholder?
- 1 September 1996
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Military Psychology
- Vol. 8 (3) , 235-245
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp0803_7
Abstract
The effect of team-member experience was examined in relation to perceptions of importance of teamwork behaviors during an analysis of team performance. Importance ratings were collected from military aircrews (i.e., two-member teams) from three distinct types of aircraft. Results indicated that when assessing team behavior importance, less experienced team members weighted difficulty of performing team behaviors more heavily, whereas more experienced team members weighted time spent performing team behaviors more heavily. Implications for analyzing team performance, with respect to the process of conducting such analyses and the type of information collected, are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Military Team Research: 10 Years of ProgressMilitary Psychology, 1995
- Measuring the Importance of Teamwork: The Reliability and Validity of Job/Task Analysis Indices for Team-Training DesignMilitary Psychology, 1994
- Assessment of Coordination Demand for Aircrew Coordination TrainingMilitary Psychology, 1993
- Principles for Measuring Teamwork SkillsHuman Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1992
- Group decision making under stress.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1991
- Determining important tasks within jobs: A policy-capturing approach.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989
- Effects of using high- versus low-performing job incumbents as sources of job-analysis information.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1987
- Measurement of Team Behaviors in a Navy EnvironmentPublished by Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC) ,1986
- Dyads and triads at 35,000 feet: Factors affecting group process and aircrew performance.American Psychologist, 1984
- The critical incident technique.Psychological Bulletin, 1954