Contemporary Issues in the Analysis of Data: A Survey of 551 Psychologists
- 1 January 1993
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Psychological Science
- Vol. 4 (1) , 49-53
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1993.tb00556.x
Abstract
We asked active psychological researchers to answer a survey regarding the following data-analytic issues: (a) the effect of reliability on Type I and Type II errors, (b) the interpretation of interaction, (c) contrast analysis, and (d) the role of power and effect size in successful replications. Our 551 participants (a 60% response rate) answered 59% of the questions correctly; 46%) accuracy would be expected according to participants' response preferences alone. Accuracy was higher for respondents with higher academic ranks and for questions with “no” as the right answer. It is suggested that although experienced researchers are able to answer difficult but basic data-analytic questions at better than chance levels, there is also a high degree of misunderstanding of some fundamental issues of data analysis.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cumulating Psychology: An Appreciation of Donald T. CampbellPsychological Science, 1991
- Things I have learned (so far).American Psychologist, 1990
- Definition and interpretation of interaction effects.Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- Brilliant but cruel: Perceptions of negative evaluatorsJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1983
- A negativity bias in interpersonal evaluationJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1982
- "Interaction effects" in the presence of asymmetrical transfer.Psychological Bulletin, 1969
- Behavioral Study of obedience.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1963
- The Interpretation of Levels of Significance by Psychological ResearchersThe Journal of Psychology, 1963
- The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: A review.The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1962
- Opinions and Social PressureScientific American, 1955